Genetic Analysis of Two Sympatric Sea Urchins from Genus Diadema (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Diadematidae) from Malaysian Borneo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/bjrst.229.2015Keywords:
Diadema, sympatric species, phylogenetic, 16S rRNA geneAbstract
Genus Diadema (Echinoidea: Diadematidae) has been reported to be the most widespread and ecologically important shallow water tropical sea urchins. Morphological variations and species distributions are complicated to elucidate due to complexity in making reliable identifications. Genus Diadema had involved in many debates, particularly on the mode of speciation and the specific status of Diadema setosum and Diadema savignyi. Therefore, relationships among Diadema species found in Malaysian Borneo have been examined using 16S rRNA gene analysis. Monophyletic clade of genus Diadema with respect to the outgroup was obtained with high bootstrap values of 100% (MP), 100% (NJ), 100% (ML) and Bayesian Posterior Probability is equal to 1.00. Two monophyletic clades were apparent separating D. setosum (Clade I) and D. savignyi (Clade II), with strong support of 100% (MP), 100% (NJ), 80% (ML) and Bayesian Posterior Probability is equal to 1.00. In addition, high genetic variation among species had been recorded (9.85%), suggesting that D. setosum and D. savignyi are two distinct entities. Furthermore, D. setosum and D. savignyi are sympatric species based on their distribution and overlapping ranges in Malaysian Borneo.References
Adel, H.A. & Khalid, P.L. (2000). Reproductive cycles of Diadema setosum and Echinometra mathaei (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) from Kuwait (Northern Arabian Gulf). Bulletin of Marine Science, 67(2): 845-856.
Clark, A.M. (1966). Echinoderms from the Red Sea, Part 2. Bulletin of Sea Fisheries Resources Israel, 41: 26-58.
Coppard, S.E. & Campbell, A.C. (2006). Taxonomic significance of test morphology in the echinoid genera Diadema Gray, 1825 and Echinothrix Peters, 1853 (Echinodermata). Zoosystema, 28: 93-112.
Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 1: 11-15.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Hillis, D.M. (1993). Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Systematic Biology, 42: 247-264.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.3.247
Kimura, M. (1980). Kimura's two-parameter model of Models of DNA Evolution. In J. Felsenstein (Eds.), Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
Leache, A.D. & Reeder, T.W. (2002). Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood and bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology, 51: 44-68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/106351502753475871
Lessios, H.A. (2001). Molecular phylogeny of Diadema: Systematic implications. In M. Barker (Eds.), Echinoderms 2000. Lisse: CRC Press. Pp 487-495.
Lessios, H.A. & Pearse, J.S. (1996). Hybridization and introgression between Indo-Pacific species of Diadema. Marine Biology, 126: 715-723.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351338
Lessios, H.A., Kessing, B.D., & Pearse, J.S. (2001). Population structure and speciation in tropical seas: global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution, 55: 955-975.
https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0955:PSASIT]2.0.CO;2
Mayr, E. (1954). Geographic speciation in tropical Echinoids. Evolution, 8: 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1954.tb00104.x
McCartney, M.A., Keller, G., & Lessios, H.A. (2000). Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation in Atlantic and eastern Pacific sea urchins of the genus Echinometra. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1391-1400.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01022.x
Mortenson, T. (1940). A monograph of the Echinoidea. III(i). Aulodonta. Denmark: Reitzel. Pp 369-379.
Palumbi, S.R. (1996). PCR and molecular systematic. In D. Hillis, C. Moritz, & B. Mable (Eds.), Molecular Systematic, 2nd edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Press.
Pearse, J.S. (1998). Distributions of Diadema savignyi and Diadema setosum in the tropical Pacific. In R. Mooi & M. Telford (Eds.), Echinoderms: San Francisco. Rotterdam: Balkema. Pp 777-782.
Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14(9): 817-818.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
Rahim, S.A.K.A., & Nurhassan, R. (2012). Edible sea urchin species in Sabah waters. Faculty of Resource Science and Technology Bulletin, 1: 2-3.
Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. (1996). Probability distribution of molecular evolution trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43: 304-311.
https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006090
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenback, J.P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Version 3.0b4. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
Sponer, R., Deheyn, D., & Roy, M.S. (2001). Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) do not support color varieties as sibling species. Marine Ecological Progress Series, 219: 169-175.
https://doi.org/10.3354/meps219169
Stockley, B., Smith, A.B., Littlewood, D.T.J., Lessios, H.A., & MacKenzie-dodds, J.A. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of spatangoid sea urchins (Echinoidea): taxon sampling density and congruence between morphological and molecular estimates. Zoological Science, 34: 447-468.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2005.00201.x
Swofford, D.L. (2000). PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., & Higgins, D.G. (1997). The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: 4876-4882.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
Yokota, Y., Matranga, V., & Smolenicka, Z. (2002). The sea urchin: From basic biology to aquaculture. Netherlands: A.A Balkema Publication.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.